Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026), Articles
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)

OLIY TA’LIMDA IQTISODIYOT SOHASIDAGI FANLARINI O‘QITISHDA “2+1” INTERFAOL METODIDAN FOYDALANISH SAMARADORLIGI

Articles
Published 2026-06-01
Xolto‘rayev Islom Ilhomovich
Navoiy innovatsiyalar universiteti Surxondaryo kampusi Umumiy fanlar kafedrasi o‘qituvchisi
PDF

Keywords

interfaol ta’lim, iqtisodiyot nazariyasi, faol o‘qitish metodlari, tanqidiy fikrlash, talabalar faolligi, kooperativ ta’lim, pedagogik innovatsiya, 2+1 metodi.

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada oliy ta’lim muassasalarida iqtisodiyot nazariyasi fanini o‘qitish jarayonida talabalar faolligini oshirish, ularning mantiqiy fikrlash, tahliliy yondashuv hamda bilimlarni mustahkamlash kompetensiyalarini rivojlantirishga xizmat qiluvchi “2+1” interfaol metodining pedagogik imkoniyatlari tadqiq etilgan. Tadqiqot davomida kunduzgi va sirtqi ta’lim shakllarida tahsil olayotgan talabalar ishtirokida tajriba-sinov ishlari amalga oshirilgan. Metodning mohiyati shundan iboratki, talabalar ikki guruhga bo‘linadi va har bir talaba o‘tilgan mavzu yuzasidan ikkita to‘g‘ri hamda bitta noto‘g‘ri fikr tayyorlaydi. Qarshi guruh vakillari muhokama orqali noto‘g‘ri fikrni aniqlashga harakat qiladi. Tadqiqot natijalari ushbu metod talabalarning auditoriya faolligi, tanqidiy fikrlash ko‘nikmalari va test natijalariga ijobiy ta’sir ko‘rsatganligini tasdiqladi.

PDF

References

1. Dewey J. Democracy and Education. – New York: Macmillan, 1916. – 434 p.

2. Bruner J. The Process of Education. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960. – 97 p.

3. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. – 159 p.

4. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive and Individualistic Learning. – Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999. – 397 p.

5. Bonwell C.C., Eison J.A. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. – Washington DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 1991. – 121 p.

6. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. – New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997. – 253 p.

7. Slavin R.E. Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. – Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2014. – 336 p.

8. Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2004. – Vol. 93. – №3. – P. 223–231.

9. Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M. et al. Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering and Mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2014. – Vol.111. – №23. – P. 8410–8415.

10. Lyman F. Think-Pair-Share: An Expanding Teaching Technique // Maryland University Press. – 1981. – P. 109–113.

11. Barkley E.F., Cross K.P., Major C.H. Collaborative Learning Techniques. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2014. – 364 p.

12. Brookfield S.D. Teaching for Critical Thinking. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2012. – 320 p.

13. Nilson L.B. Teaching at Its Best. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016. – 432 p.

14. Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. – Berkshire: Open University Press, 2011. – 479 p.

15. Ambrose S.A., Bridges M.W., DiPietro M. et al. How Learning Works. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010. – 336 p.

16. Brown P.C., Roediger H.L., McDaniel M.A. Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014. – 313 p.