Keywords
Abstract
In the context of global environmental challenges and sustainable development goals, the formation of ecological thinking and creative competencies among students has become one of the key objectives of modern education. This study examines the pedagogical potential of the Eco-STEAM approach (Ecology integrated with Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics) in teaching physics. The integration of ecological concepts into physics lessons allows students to understand natural phenomena not only from a scientific and technological perspective but also through an environmental and humanistic lens. The research analyzes how Eco-STEAM-based learning activities contribute to students’ ecological awareness, critical and creative thinking, and ability to apply physics knowledge to solving real-world environmental problems. Experimental observations carried out at Gulistan State University indicate that Eco-STEAM projects and experiments enhance students’ motivation, teamwork, and scientific creativity. The study also presents methodological recommendations for implementing Eco-STEAM in physics teaching to foster responsible, innovative, and environmentally conscious learners.
References
1. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
2. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press.
3. Çalık, M., & Coll, R. K. (2012). Investigating socio-scientific issues via scientific habits of mind: Development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909–1930.
4. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
5. Gurevich, L., & Gurevich, P. (2021). Eco-STEAM: A methodological approach to environmental education through interdisciplinary integration. Journal of Environmental Education Research, 27(3), 215–229.
6. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2015). Imaginative Science Education: The Central Role of Imagination in Science Education. Springer.
7. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM Integration in K–12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8. Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). STEAM Education: Theory and Practice. Springer.
9. Kim, B., & Park, N. (2020). Developing eco-creative thinking through STEAM-based environmental science education. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(1), 1–18.
10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
12. OECD. (2019). OECD Learning Compass 2030: A Series of Concept Notes. Paris: OECD Publishing.
13. Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand Is to Invent: The Future of Education. New York: Grossman.
14. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Capstone Publishing.
15. Şahin, A. (2015). The effects of integrated STEM education on students’ academic achievement and creativity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(2), 34–48.
16. Shoyzakova, H. Y., & Suyunov, U. H. (2025). Integrating Eco-STEAM in physics education to enhance environmental thinking and creative competencies. Journal of Innovative Pedagogy and Science Education, 4(2), 45–59.