Abstract
Since 2016 Uzbekistan has combined sweeping market reforms with a rapid rise in foreign direct investment (FDI). Annual inflows climbed from USD 1.8 billion in 2016 to more than USD 7.2 billion in 2023, and preliminary balance-of-payments data show a further 32 percent jump in 2024 . Unlike the resource-centric FDI patterns that long characterised the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), new capital now targets manufacturing, ICT, and renewable energy. This article asks a simple but under-researched question: does the quality and sectoral orientation of FDI matter for social stability in a transitional economy? Using panel regressions, perception surveys, and case evidence from the Ferghana Valley, the paper demonstrates that sector-specific FDI—when channelled into labour-intensive, high-value chains—correlates with lower unemployment, reduced regional income gaps, and a measurable decline in protest episodes. The analysis positions Uzbekistan as a laboratory for post-Soviet economies seeking to reconcile fast growth with social cohesion.
References
Alfaro, L. (2017). Gains from Foreign Direct Investment: Macro and Micro Approaches. World Bank Economic Review.
2. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J-W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics.
3. Central Bank of Uzbekistan. (2025). Balance-of-Payments Bulletin Q4-2024.
4. Kheyfets, B. & Chetverikova, A. (2019). FDI in the Eurasian Economic Union: Structure and Development Trends. Journal of Eurasian Studies.
5. IMF. (2025). Uzbekistan: Staff Concluding Statement of the 2025 Article IV Mission.
6. State Department. (2024). Investment Climate Statement: Uzbekistan.
7. UNCTADstat. (2024). FDI Stock and Flow by Sector.
8. World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators – FDI Net Inflows (% of GDP).