Keywords
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada Kazuo Ishiguroning “Hech qachon meni qo’yib yuborma” (2005) romanidagi hissiy cheklanish hodisasi psixologik va diskursiv darajada bir vaqtning o'zida namoyon bo'luvchi jarayon sifatida o'rganiladi. Freyd tomonidan taklif qilingan repressiya va suppressiya o'rtasidagi farqqa, shuningdek sukunat va yo'qlikka oid tanqidiy diskurs yondashuvlariga tayangan holda, tadqiqot Ketti H., Rut va Tommi obrazlari o'z qayg'usi, g'azabi va qo'rquvini turlicha boshqarishini, Heylsham esa o'quvchilarida evfemistik institutsional lug'at orqali cheklovni tarbiyalashini ko'rsatadi. Maqolada Ishiguroning bosiq nasriy uslubi shunchaki stilistik bezak emas, balki qahramonlar boshdan kechirayotgan xuddi shu cheklanishni hikoya shakli darajasida qayta ishlab chiqaruvchi strukturaviy vosita ekanligi asoslanadi. Bundan tashqari, individual va institutsional bostirish nafaqat darajasi, balki mohiyati bilan farqlanishi ta'kidlanadi: birinchisi ongli ravishda qaytarilishi mumkin bo'lsa, ikkinchisi bolalikdan til orqali o'zlashtiriladi va shu sababli Freyd repressiyaga xos deb bilgan deyarli avtomatik jarayonga yaqinlashadi; bu da'vo Altyusserning mafkuraviy interpellyatsiya nazariyasiga tayangan holda asoslanadi, oddiy o'xshatish sifatida emas.
References
1. Achino-Loeb, M.-L. (Ed.). (2006). Silence: The currency of power. Berghahn Books.
2. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays. Monthly Review Press.
3. Baldick, C. (2015). The Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford University Press.
4. Baziliansky, S., & Cohen, M. (2021). Emotion regulation and psychological distress in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stress and Health, 37(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2972
5. Black, S. (2009). Ishiguro's inhuman aesthetics. Modern Fiction Studies, 55(4), 785–807.
6. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
7. Brewin, C. R., & Andrews, B. (2017). Creating memories for false autobiographical events in childhood: A systematic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3220
8. Cuddon, J. A. (2013). A dictionary of literary terms and literary theory (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
9. Erdelyi, M. H. (2006). The unified theory of repression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009113
10. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
11. Freud, S. (1915/1957). Repression. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 141–158). Hogarth Press.
12. Freud, S. (1927). The ego and the id. Hogarth Press.
13. Griffin, M. (2009). Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go and Ruddick's maternal thinking. Studies in the Novel, 41(4), 645–663.
14. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997). Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.95
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
16. Hyvärinen, M. (2008). Friendship, care, and politics: Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 12(1), 202–223.
17. Ishiguro, K. (2005). Never Let Me Go. Vintage International.
18. Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Sage Publications.
19. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
20. Nobel Prize Outreach. (2017). The Nobel Prize in Literature 2017: Kazuo Ishiguro [Press release]. NobelPrize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2017/press-release/
21. Robbins, B. (2007). Cruelty is bad: Banality and proximity in Never Let Me Go. Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 40(3), 289–302.
22. Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse. John Benjamins.