FEATURES OF THE USE OF SYNTHETIC DENTAL MATERIALS IN PATIENTS WITH ALLERGIC DERMATOSES
PDF

Keywords

allergic dermatoses, dental materials, synthetic materials, acrylates, methacrylates, allergic contact dermatitis, hypersensitivity, dental composites, prosthodontics, biocompatibility.

Abstract

The increasing use of synthetic materials in modern dentistry has significantly expanded the possibilities of restorative, prosthetic and orthodontic treatment. However, the widespread application of resin-based materials, acrylic polymers, adhesives and other synthetic compounds raises important questions concerning their biocompatibility, particularly in patients with a history of allergic dermatoses. Such patients may have an increased susceptibility to contact sensitization, although the presence of allergic skin disease does not automatically indicate an allergy to dental materials. Of particular clinical importance are acrylates and methacrylates, including methyl methacrylate (MMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), and bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA). Residual, incompletely polymerized monomers may act as haptens and induce delayed type IV hypersensitivity reactions. Clinical manifestations may include oral burning, erythema, cheilitis, stomatitis, perioral dermatitis and exacerbation of pre-existing eczematous skin lesions. The purpose of this review is to analyze the main features of using synthetic dental materials in patients with allergic dermatoses and to formulate practical recommendations for their safe clinical application. A careful allergy history, individualized selection of materials, adequate polymerization, minimization of direct tissue contact with uncured substances, and collaboration between dentists and dermatologists are essential components of prevention.

PDF

References

1. Smidtas L, Johnson J, Rocha Pacheco R, Jauregui C. Allergenic and cytotoxic potential of (meth)acrylate monomers in dental materials: a narrative review. Frontiers in Dental Medicine. 2026;7:1846292.

2. Kumar P, et al. Allergic Reactions to Dental Materials—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2015.

3. Spencer A, Gazzani P, Thompson DA. Acrylate and methacrylate contact allergy and allergic contact disease: a 13-year review. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:157–164.

4. Aalto-Korte K, et al. Acrylate contact allergy: patient characteristics and evaluation of screening allergens. Dermatitis. 2011;22:98–101.

5. Aerts O, et al. Contact allergies to dental materials in patients. British Journal of Dermatology. 2023.

6. Sasseville D. Acrylates in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2012;23:6–16.

7. Kanerva L. Cross-reactions of multifunctional methacrylates and acrylates. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2001;59:320–329.

8. Aerts O, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 2017.