Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026), Articles
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026)

SOFENA PLATFORMASIDA TA’LIM KONTENTINI BOSHQARISH TIZIMINING FUNKSIONAL ARXITEKTURASI

Articles
Published 2026-07-14
Zubaytova Mehriniso Husniddinovna
Buxoro davlat innovatsiyalar universiteti magistranti E-mail: zubaytovazubaytova@gmail.com ORCID: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21195984
PDF

Keywords

SOFENA, ta’lim platformasi, kontent boshqaruv tizimi, funksional arxitektura, ta’lim kontenti, metadata, versiyalarni boshqarish, moderatsiya, semantik qidiruv.

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada SOFENA platformasida ta’lim kontentini yaratish, tahrirlash, ekspertizadan o‘tkazish, nashr etish, saqlash, qidirish va foydalanuvchilarga yetkazib berish jarayonlarini qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi kontent boshqaruv tizimining funksional arxitekturasi tahlil qilinadi. Raqamli ta’lim muhitida o‘quv materiallari sonining ortishi, ularning turli formatlarda yaratilishi va muntazam yangilanib borishi markazlashgan, xavfsiz va kengayuvchan boshqaruv mexanizmini talab qiladi. Tadqiqotda tizimli tahlil, funksional dekompozitsiya, rollarga asoslangan kirish nazorati, kontent hayotiy siklini modellashtirish va arxitektura komponentlarini qiyosiy baholash metodlaridan foydalanildi. SOFENA platformasi uchun kontent yaratish moduli, metadata boshqaruvi, versiyalarni nazorat qilish, ekspertiza va moderatsiya, qidiruv va indekslash, multimedia saqlash, analitika, integratsiya hamda xavfsizlik qatlamlaridan iborat funksional model taklif etildi. Tahlil natijasida modulli arxitektura kontent bilan ishlash jarayonlarini standartlashtirish, takroriy materiallarni kamaytirish, muallif va ekspertlar o‘rtasidagi hamkorlikni yaxshilash, nashr jarayonining shaffofligini ta’minlash hamda ta’lim resurslaridan foydalanish samaradorligini oshirish imkonini berishi asoslandi. Maqolada SOFENA kontent boshqaruv tizimini mikroxizmatlar, API integratsiyasi va metadata standartlari bilan rivojlantirish bo‘yicha ilmiy-amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqildi.

PDF

References

1. Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L. “An Argument for Clarity: What Are Learning Management Systems, What Are They Not, and What Should They Become?” TechTrends, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2007, pp. 28–34.

2. Wiley, D. A. The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 2002.

3. Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative. SCORM Users Guide for Instructional Designers. U.S. Department of Defense, 2011.

4. Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative. Experience API Specification. ADL, Version 1.0.3, 2016.

5. IEEE. IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. IEEE 1484.12.1-2002, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2002.

6. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. DCMI Metadata Terms. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative.

7. Newman, S. Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems. 2nd ed., O’Reilly Media, 2021.

8. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R. Software Architecture in Practice. 4th ed., Addison-Wesley, 2021.