Abstract
This article explores the significance of research methodology in improving scientific writing skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) university students. As scientific research leads to academic success, students should be trained to do research with correct and engaging approaches. The study also examines the main types of research methodology. However, many EFL students struggle with critical thinking, research organization, and language proficiency. This writing includes the key challenges many EFL students face, such as language barriers, challenges of understanding research concepts, and insufficient knowledge of academic writing conventions. It suggests practical solutions that can be used in real-life situations, like specialized vocabulary and phrase instruction, improving understanding of research concepts, and strengthening academic writing onventions.
References
1. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
2. Cumming, A. (2018). Learning to Write in a Second Language: Two Decades of Research. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
3. Fan, N. (2023). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing quality: A mixed-methods study. SAGE Open, 13(2).DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181296
4. Beiki, M., Gharagozloo, N., & Raissi, R. (2020). The effect of structured versus unstructured collaborative pre-writing task on writing skills of Iranian EFL students. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(18).
5. Alharthi, S. (2021). From instructed writing to free-writing: A study of EFL learners. SAGE Open, 11(2).
6. Tovar, E. V. (2016). Effectiveness of systemic text analysis in EFL writing instruction. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 13, 11–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.310
7. Rusmiati, R., Maharami, K., & Shaumiwaty, S. (2024). Does journaling practice affect EFL students’ writing ability? LingTera. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v12i1.71209