Abstract
The development of students’ critical thinking competencies has become one of the central priorities of contemporary education because the quality of learning is no longer measured only by the reproduction of knowledge, but also by the ability to analyze information, compare arguments, evaluate evidence, and make reasoned decisions. In this context, summative assessment is often interpreted as a mechanism for measuring final achievement, while its developmental potential remains underused. The present article examines the scientific and theoretical foundations for developing students’ critical thinking competencies in summative assessment conditions. The study is based on a theoretical and analytical approach that synthesizes psychological, pedagogical, competence-based, and assessment-related perspectives. The article argues that summative assessment can serve not only a control function but also a formative cognitive function when it is designed around higher-order thinking tasks, transparent criteria, evidence-based judgment, and reflective procedures.
References
1. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company, 1956.
2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 2001.
3. Halpern, D. F. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. 5th ed. New York: Psychology Press, 2014.
4. Paul, R., Elder, L., Bartell, T. A Brief History of the Idea of Critical Thinking. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking, 1997.
5. Scriven, M., Paul, R. Defining Critical Thinking: A Draft Statement for the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking // Foundation for Critical Thinking. 1987.
6. Nitko, A. J., Brookhart, S. M. Educational Assessment of Students. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2019.
7. Stiggins, R. J. Assessment for Learning: An Essential Foundation of Productive Instruction // In: Andrade, H. L., Cizek, G. J. eds. Handbook of Formative Assessment. New York: Routledge, 2010. P. 3–24.
8. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., Glaser, R. eds. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.
9. McMillan, J. H. Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2018.