INTEGRATION OF TECHNOLOGY IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION (SLA)
PDF

Keywords

Second Language Acquisition (SLA); technology integration; computer-assisted language learning (CALL); digital literacy; input hypothesis; sociocultural theory; interaction hypothesis; blended learning; online communication; language pedagogy

Abstract

This article explores the integration of technology in Second Language Acquisition (SLA), highlighting its theoretical foundations, benefits, challenges, and pedagogical implications. Drawing on established SLA theories such as Krashen’s Input Hypothesis, Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory, and Long’s Interaction Hypothesis, the article demonstrates how digital tools align with and extend core principles of language learning. Benefits include access to authentic materials, adaptive learning, increased motivation, and opportunities for global interaction. However, challenges such as the digital divide, teacher preparedness, and ethical considerations regarding data privacy are also examined. The article argues that effective technology integration requires pedagogically sound implementation, where digital tools supplement rather than replace human instruction. Ultimately, the integration of technology in SLA represents a dynamic partnership that enhances linguistic competence while fostering digital literacy for global communication.

PDF

References

1. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins.

2. Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 741–753.

3. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118.

4. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.

5. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326.

6. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

7. Lamy, M.-N., & Hampel, R. (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.

8. Li, S. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in second language acquisition: Opportunities and challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–12.

9. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

10. Munday, P. (2016). The case for using DUOLINGO as part of the language classroom experience. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1), 83–101.

11. Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (2010). Task-based language learning and teaching with technology. Continuum.

12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

13. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3–20). Logos International.

14. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

15. Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71.

16. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–27.