Keywords
Abstract
. Maqolada generativ sun’iy intellektdan foydalanish sharoitida magistrantlarning akademik halolligini ta’minlashning pedagogik asoslari boshlang‘ich ta’lim mutaxassisligi kontekstida tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi sun’iy intellekt vositalaridan foydalanish, magistrantning mustaqil intellektual hissasi va ilmiy natijalar uchun javobgarligi o‘rtasidagi munosabatni aniqlashtirish hamda ushbu munosabatni tartibga soluvchi pedagogik shartlarni ishlab chiqishdan iborat. Maqsadli tanlangan ilmiy maqolalar va xalqaro tavsiyalar konseptual tahlil, qiyoslash hamda pedagogik modellashtirish asosida o‘rganildi. Natijada topshiriqqa mos foydalanish qoidalari, tanqidiy sun’iy intellekt savodxonligi, tadqiqot jarayonini hujjatlashtirish, dalillarni tekshirish va adolatli baholashni birlashtiruvchi yondashuv taklif etildi. Akademik halollikni baholashda texnik indikatorlarni magistrantning izohi, manbalar bilan ishlashi va metodologik qarorlari bilan birgalikda ko‘rib chiqish zarurati asoslandi. Maqolaning amaliy ahamiyati magistratura mashg‘ulotlari, ilmiy rahbarlik va tadqiqot topshiriqlarini loyihalashga xizmat qiluvchi mezonlar ishlab chiqilganida namoyon bo‘ladi. Taklif etilgan yondashuv nazariy xususiyatga ega bo‘lib, uning samaradorligi keyingi empirik tadqiqotlarda tekshirilishi lozim.
References
British Educational Research Association. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. — 5th ed. — London: BERA, 2024.
2. COPE Council. COPE Position: Authorship and AI. — Version 1. — COPE, 2024. — DOI: 10.24318/cCVRZBms.
3. Foltynek T., Bjelobaba S., Glendinning I., Khan Z. R., Santos R., Pavletic P., Kravjar J. ENAI Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education // International Journal for Educational Integrity. — 2023. — Vol. 19. — Article 12. — DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4.
4. Lodge J. M., Howard S., Bearman M., Dawson P. et al. Assessment Reform for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. — Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, 2023.
5. Miao F., Cukurova M. AI Competency Framework for Teachers. — Paris: UNESCO, 2024.
6. Miao F., Holmes W. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. — Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
7. Perkins M., Furze L., Roe J., MacVaugh J. The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment // Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. — 2024. — Vol. 21, No. 6. — DOI: 10.53761/q3azde36.
8. Van Vlasselaer M., Van Droogenbroeck F., Spruyt B. Who Wrote This? Evaluating the Reliability of AI Detection Tools in Higher Education // International Journal for Educational Integrity. — 2026. — Vol. 22. — Article 16. — DOI: 10.1007/s40979-026-00226-w.
9. Walters W. H., Wilder E. I. Fabrication and Errors in the Bibliographic Citations Generated by ChatGPT // Scientific Reports. — 2023. — Vol. 13. — Article 14045. — DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5.
10. Weber-Wulff D., Anohina-Naumeca A., Bjelobaba S., Foltýnek T., Guerrero-Dib J., Popoola O., Šigut P., Waddington L. Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text // International Journal for Educational Integrity. — 2023. — Vol. 19. — Article 26. — DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.