Keywords
Abstract
Maqolada texnologik ta'lim yo'nalishi talabalarining malakaviy va pedagogik amaliyot jarayonidagi tayyorgarligini baholash muammosi kompetensiyaviy va dalillarga asoslangan yondashuv nuqtayi nazaridan tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda normativ hujjatlar, autentik baholash, shakllantiruvchi qayta aloqa va refleksiv amaliyotga oid ilmiy manbalar mazmuniy tahlil qilindi. Natijada motivatsion-maqsadli, texnologik-operatsion, metodik-loyihaviy, kommunikativ-tashkiliy hamda refleksiv-korreksion mezonlardan iborat diagnostik tizim taklif etildi. Har bir mezon kuzatiladigan indikatorlar, dalil manbalari va to'rt darajali tavsiflar bilan aniqlashtirildi. Baholashning yakuniy mahsulot, faoliyat jarayoni, talabaning qarorni asoslash qobiliyati va keyingi takomillashtirish rejasini birgalikda qamrab olishi asoslandi. Taklif etilgan mexanizm subyektiv umumiy bahoni kamaytirish, mentorlar xulosalarini muvofiqlashtirish va talabaga rivojlantiruvchi qayta aloqa berish imkonini yaratadi.
References
1. O'zbekiston Respublikasining 2020-yil 23-sentabrdagi O'RQ-637-son “Ta'lim to'g'risida”gi Qonuni.
2. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 27-fevraldagi PQ-4623-son “Pedagogik ta'lim sohasini yanada rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to'g'risida”gi Qarori.
3. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 21-iyundagi PQ-289-son Qarori.
4. Pedagogika ta'lim sohasi talabalarining malakaviy pedagogik amaliyotini tashkil etish tartibi to'g'risida Muvaqqat nizom. 2019-yil 5-mart, 10-q/q-13-4-son qarorga ilova.
5. Gulikers J.T.M., Bastiaens T.J., Kirschner P.A. A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment // Educational Technology Research and Development. 2004. Vol. 52, No. 3. P. 67-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504676.
6. Nicol D.J., Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice // Studies in Higher Education. 2006. Vol. 31, No. 2. P. 199-218. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090.
7. Schön D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983. 374 p.
8. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge // Teachers College Record. 2006. Vol. 108, No. 6. P. 1017-1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
9. Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011. 389 p.
10. Boud D., Molloy E. Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 38, No. 6. P. 698-712. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.