Keywords
Abstract
Oliy ta’limda sun’iy intellektga asoslangan imtihon platformalarining ko‘payishi akademik yaxlitlikka tahdid soluvchi jiddiy xavfsizlik muammolarini keltirib chiqardi. Ushbu maqolada miqdoriy tadqiqot dizaynidan foydalangan holda sun’iy intellektga asoslangan baholash tizimlari uchun xavfsizlik mexanizmlarini empirik ravishda baholaydi. Ma’lumotlar 7 ta umumiy-o‘rta ta’lim muassasasidagi 234 akademik ma’mur, o‘qituvchilar va IT xavfsizligi mutaxassislaridan to‘plangan. Biometrik autentifikatsiya, sun’iy intellektni nazorat qilish mexanizmlari, ma’lumotlarni shifrlash protokollari va platforma xavfsizligi samaradorligi o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarni o‘rganish uchun qisman eng kichik kvadratlar strukturaviy tenglama modellashtirish (PLS-SEM) qo‘llanildi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, biometrik autentifikatsiya (beta = 0.456, p < 0.001) va sun’iy intellektni nazorat qilish tizimlari (beta = 0.389, p < 0.001) imtihon xavfsizligini sezilarli darajada oshiradi. Ma'lumotlarni shifrlash ma'lumotlar yaxlitligiga ijobiy ta’sir ko‘rsatadi (beta = 0.312, p < 0.01). Integratsiyalashgan xavfsizlik tizimi an’anaviy imtihon usullariga nisbatan akademik yaxlitlik buzilishini 34,2% ga kamaytiradi. Ushbu tadqiqot xavfsizlik talablarini talabalarning shaxsiy hayoti va kirish imkoniyati bilan muvozanatlashtiradigan xavfsiz sun’iy intellektga asoslangan imtihon platformalarini ishlab chiqish bo‘yicha dalillarga asoslangan ko‘rsatmalar berdi.
References
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). In Handbook of Market Research, 1-40. Springer.
[2] Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 31-39.
[3] Garcia, R., Falkner, K., & Vitale, J. (2023). AI in educational assessment: Opportunities and challenges. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100123.
[4] Williamson, D. M., Xi, X., & Breyer, F. J. (2022). A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 41(1), 16-29.
[5] Milano, S., McGrane, J. A., & Leonelli, M. (2021). AI and responsible innovation in education. AI & Society, 36(3), 913-925.
[6] N. Yuldashev (2025). The Development of Automated Creating Test Questions Using Artificial Intelligence: Knowledge Estimation” International Journal of Pedagogics, ISSN 2771-2281, Pages: 185-189, Volume 05 Issue 06 June 2025.
[7] Rudner, L. M., & Liang, T. (2022). Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 20(1), 1-11.