Keywords
Abstract
Maqolada bo’lajak pedagoglarda kasbiy kompetensiyalarni rivojlantirishda kriterial-diagnostik baholash va individual rivojlantirish tizimining nazariy-metodologik asoslari tahlil qilinadi. Kompetensiya tushunchasining zamonaviy talqinlari, kriterial va diagnostik baholashning mohiyati, formativ fikr-mulohaza hamda o’z-o’zini boshqarish haqidagi xalqaro tadqiqotlar sintez qilinadi. Mavjud nazariyalarga tayanib, diagnostika, kriterial baholash va individual rivojlantirishni yagona tsiklga birlashtiruvchi konseptual model taklif etiladi. Model empirik tekshiruvni talab qiluvchi nazariy konstruksiya ekanligi alohida ta’kidlanadi.
References
1. O’zbekiston Respublikasi (2019). O’zbekiston Respublikasi xalq ta’limi tizimini 2030 yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to’g’risida. Prezident Farmoni PF-5712, 29.04.2019.
2. O’zbekiston Respublikasi (2020). Ta’lim to’g’risida. O’zbekiston Respublikasining Qonuni, O’RQ-637, 23.09.2020.
3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
4. Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(2), 153–170.
5. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
6. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
8. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13.
9. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
11. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.
12. Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 18(8), 519–521.
13. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
14. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.
15. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97.
16. Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820.
17. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
18. Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65(9 Suppl.), S63–S67.
19. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
20. OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
21. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.
22. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (Y. Punie, Ed.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
23. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
24. Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194.
25. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
26. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
27. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
30. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
31. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.