Keywords
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive structural analysis of internet discourse, moving beyond textual content to examine the underlying frameworks that shape how language is produced, distributed, and received online. The findings reveal that structural analysis is essential for understanding phenomena like misinformation, public deliberation, and identity performance, as the "rules of the game" are often coded into the digital environment itself.
References
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press.
2. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.
3. Herring, S. C. (2007). A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse. Language@Internet, 4(1).
4. Miller, C. R., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog. In Into the Blogosphere.
5. Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. Continuum.
6. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. NYU Press.
7. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity.
8. boyd, d. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
9. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
10. Langlois, G., & Elmer, G. (2013). The Research Politics of Social Media Platforms. Culture Machine, 14, 1–17.