Keywords
Abstract
This paper explores the challenges faced by Uzbek EFL learners in understanding and applying intercultural pragmatics during English-Uzbek communication. It examines how cultural differences in speech acts, politeness strategies, and conversational norms affect communication effectiveness. The study highlights common pragmatic failures and their impact on learners’ language competence and intercultural awareness. Based on classroom observations and learner feedback, the paper suggests pedagogical approaches to enhance pragmatic competence, including the integration of cultural content and communicative practice in EFL curricula.
References
1. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.
2. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex Publishing.
3. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishing.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1996). Pragmatics and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 138–161.
5. Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. System, 29(4), 459–472.
6. House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 19, 49–68.
7. Karimova, N. (2022). Challenges of teaching intercultural pragmatics in Uzbek EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 5(1), 24–32.
8. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
9. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
10. Uzbek State World Languages University. (2020). Integrating intercultural pragmatics in EFL curricula. Tashkent.