THE PROBLEM OF THE OZONE LAYER: SCIENTIFIC DATA AND DISCUSSION
PDF

Keywords

ozone layer, ultraviolet radiation, atmospheric chemistry, Montreal Protocol, environmental policy, climate change, stratosphere, global cooperation.

Abstract

This article examines the global problem of ozone layer depletion, focusing on its scientific foundations, data trends, and the continuing international discussion surrounding its recovery. The ozone layer serves as a natural protective barrier, shielding life on Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation. However, its depletion, first observed in the late 20th century, has had far-reaching consequences for the environment, human health, and climate systems. Through a detailed review of empirical data and scientific research, this paper analyzes the causes of ozone layer thinning, assesses global and regional variations, and explores the effectiveness of international policy measures such as the Montreal Protocol. It also discusses ongoing debates concerning the pace of recovery, the influence of climate change, and the potential risks associated with new industrial emissions. The study concludes that despite observable progress, continuous monitoring and global cooperation remain essential to fully restore and maintain the integrity of the ozone shield.

PDF

References

1. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 59, Geneva, 2023.

2. UNEP. Environmental Effects Assessment Panel Report: Ozone Depletion and its Consequences, 2023.

3. NASA Ozone Watch. Ozone Data and Trends (2000–2024). https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov

4. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory. Stratospheric Ozone and Halocarbon Trends, Annual Summary 2024.

5. Crutzen, P. J. (1970). The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 96(408), 320–325.

6. Molina, M. J., & Rowland, F. S. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine atom-catalyzed destruction of ozone. Nature, 249, 810–812.

7. Solomon, S. (1999). Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history. Reviews of Geophysics, 37(3), 275–316.

8. Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., & Shanklin, J. D. (1985). Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO/NO₂ interaction. Nature, 315, 207–210.

9. Newman, P. A. et al. (2023). Antarctic ozone recovery and the Montreal Protocol. Nature Geoscience, 16(5), 422–430.

10. Weatherhead, E. C., & Andersen, S. B. (2006). The search for signs of recovery of the ozone layer. Nature, 441(7089), 39–45.

11. Daniel, J. S., & Velders, G. J. M. (2011). A focus on information and policy: Lessons from the Montreal Protocol. Climatic Change, 106(4), 509–522.

12. Montzka, S. A., Dutton, G. S., Yu, P. et al. (2018). An unexpected and persistent increase in global emissions of ozone-depleting CFC-11. Nature, 557, 413–417.

13. World Bank. Protecting the Ozone Layer and the Climate: The Montreal Protocol’s Achievements and Future Challenges, 2022.

14. Fahey, D. W., et al. (2023). Twenty Questions and Answers About the Ozone Layer: 2022 Update. WMO/UNEP, Geneva.

15. Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (2016). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. John Wiley & Sons.

16. Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., Schmidt, A. (2016). Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer. Science, 353(6296), 269–274.

17. Tegtmeier, S., et al. (2020). Unregulated very short-lived substances: A growing threat to the ozone layer. Atmospheric Environment, 233, 117536.

18. Velders, G. J. M., Daniel, J. S., Montzka, S. A. (2022). The Montreal Protocol and the Kigali Amendment: A new chapter in climate protection. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 1–12.

19. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. The Ozone Hole: 40 Years of Progress. GISS Research Summary, 2024.

20. Hegglin, M. I., & Shepherd, T. G. (2009). Large climate-induced changes in UV index and stratospheric ozone. Nature Geoscience, 2, 687–691.