Keywords
Abstract
Ushbu ilmiy tadqiqot dalillar nazariyasi va isbot qilish jarayonining ikki davlat - O'zbekiston Respublikasi va Singapur Respublikasi misolidagi qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlilini taqdim etadi. O'zbekiston inkvizitsion sud jarayoni elementlariga ega Roman-German huquq oilasining vakili sifatida ko'rib chiqiladi; Singapur esa tortish modeli va protsessual normalarning doimiy modernizatsiyasi bilan ajralib turadigan Umumiy huquq tizimining ilg'or yurisdiksiyasi sifatida namoyon bo'ladi. Tadqiqotning asosiy maqsadi har ikki tizimda isbotlashning konseptual asoslarini tahlil qilish, isbotlash standartlari va dalillarning maqbullik mezonlarini solishtirish, hamda Singapur Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksiga 2024–2025 yillarda kiritilgan islohotlarni o'rganishdan iborat. Ishda O'zbekiston qonunchiligini takomillashtirish bo'yicha strategik tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan: «aqlga sig'adigan shubhadan tashqari» standartini joriy etish, elektron dalillar protokollarini mustahkamlash va shaxsga doir ma'lumotlar himoyasini kuchaytirish.
References
Islomov, I. (2026). Dalillar va isbot qilish nazariyasi: O'zbekiston va Singapur qonunchiligining qiyosiy tahlili. UWED Ilmiy-ish, Toshkent.
[2] Stalbovskaya, M. (2005). A Guide to Legal Research in Uzbekistan. GlobaLex, NYU Law School. https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/uzbekistan.html
[3] Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. https://indianjournals.com/article/ajrssh-12-5-028
[4] Comparative Legal Analysis of Personal Data in the Legislation of Uzbekistan, Europe and the USA. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399253642
[5] Comparative Legal Analysis of Personal Data in Uzbekistan. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy. https://irshadjournals.com/index.php/ujldp/article/view/482
[6] Ministry of Law, Singapore (2025). Commencement of Amendments Relating to Investigation Powers under the Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024. https://www.mlaw.gov.sg
[7] Ministry of Law, Singapore (2025). Phase 3 Commencement of the Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024. https://www.mlaw.gov.sg
[8] Brown, J., Kudat, A., & McGeeney, K. (2005). Improving Legislation Through Social Analysis: A Case Study in Methodology from the Water Sector in Uzbekistan. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu
[9] Urinboyev, R., & Eraliev, S. (2022). Islamic Legal Culture in Uzbkistan: Legal Pluralism and CriticalSocialAnalysis.Taylor&Francis https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/27706869.2023.2269511
[10] Urinboyev, R. (2023). Political and Administrative Life of Mahalla: Ethnographic Study. Review of Law & Economics / Law & Society Review.
[11] Rajah & Tann Asia (2025). Enhancements to Criminal Disclosure and Unsoundness of Mind Regime Take Effect on 14 February 2025. https://www.rajahtannasia.com
[12] Ministry of Home Affairs, Singapore (2024). Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill 2024 — Warrantless Search Powers. https://www.mha.gov.sg
[13] Singapore Statutes Online (2025). Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2025 (S 555/2025) — Case for the Prosecution/Defence. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL-Supp/S555-2025
[14] Singapore Statutes Online (2024). Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024 (Act 5/2024) — Section 169 Inferences. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts-Supp/5-2024
[15] Singapore Statutes Online (2024). Criminal Procedure (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2024 — Amendment of Section 169 (Consequences of Non-Disclosure). https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Acts-Supp/5-2024