Keywords
Abstract
Surgical management of complex pelvic and spinal fractures has evolved significantly with the integration of patient-specific morphometry and advanced navigation technologies. The identification of "safe zones"—anatomical corridors that permit stable hardware fixation while avoiding critical neurovascular structures—is the cornerstone of successful outcomes. In 2026, research has shifted from generalized anatomical guidelines to high-precision, AI-driven, and gender-specific models. This review synthesizes current evidence on the Ramadanov–Zabler Safe Zone for sacroiliac fixation, infra-acetabular corridors, and the refined precision of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in the spine.
References
1. Ramadanov, N., & Zabler, S. (2025). Ramadanov–Zabler Safe Zone for Sacroiliac Screw Placement: A CT-Based Computational Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine.
2. Zhang, H., et al. (2025). Comparison of robotic AI-assisted and manual pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar fractures. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.
3. Liu, Y., et al. (2025). Defining safe zones for the infra-acetabular screw: A gender-specific morphometric analysis. ScienceDirect.
4. Sakamoto, A., et al. (2026). AI-guided Spinal Screw Planning for Cervical Spine Procedures: A 2026 Perspective. Spine.
5. Chen, X., et al. (2025). Robotic pedicle screw placement with 3D MRI registration: A radiation-free alternative. The Spine Journal.
6. Wang, Q., et al. (2025). Anatomical Feature Constrained Path Planning for Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement. Springer: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
7. Miller, A. N., & Routt, M. L. C. (2022). Variations in sacral morphology and implications for iliosacral screw fixation. JAAOS.
8. Taoka, T., et al. (2025). Evaluated Trends in Lumbosacral-Pelvic Fixation Strategies. PubMed.