Keywords
Abstract
Maqolada parlament reportajlari va tahliliy maqolalarda qoʻllanadigan ritorik usullar hamda argumentatsiya tuzilishi nazariy jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot klassik ritorika, yangi ritorika, Toulmin modeli, pragma dialektik yondashuv, metafora nazariyasi va argumentatsiya sxemalariga tayanadi. Natijada reportaj bilan tahliliy maqolaning argumentatsion farqlari aniqlandi, parlament matnida uchraydigan ritorik usullar tizimlashtirildi va ularni baholashning amaliy savollari taklif etildi.
References
. Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse / transl. by G. A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
2. Eemeren F. H. van, Grootendorst R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
3. Entman R. M. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm // Journal of Communication. 1993. Vol. 43, No. 4.
4. Kovach B., Rosenstiel T. The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Crown Publishers, 2001.
5. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
6. Perelman C., Olbrechts-Tyteca L. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
7. Toulmin S. E. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
8. Walton D., Reed C., Macagno F. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.