Vol. 2 No. 5 (2026), Articles
Vol. 2 No. 5 (2026)

TRANSFORMATION OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE PROSPECTS

Articles
Published 2026-02-25
Ahmadjonov Shohruhbek Rustamjon ogli
Student of the Faculty of International Law, University of World Economy and Diplomacy
Rahimova Nargiza Khamidullaevna
Senior lecturer at the department of Uzbek and Russian languages at the University of World Economy and Diplomacy
PDF

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, international law, EU AI act, legal personality, risk-based approach, algorithmic transparency, liability, digital sovereignty.

Abstract

The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has outpaced existing legal frameworks, creating a "normative gap" in international and national law. This research explores the global transformation of AI regulation, focusing on the shift from ethical guidelines to binding legal instruments. Utilizing a comparative legal analysis of the EU AI Act, US sectoral approaches, and China’s algorithmic governance, the study identifies a prevailing "risk-based approach" as the emerging international standard. The findings suggest that while AI does not yet require "electronic personhood," it necessitates a functional legal status to address liability and transparency. The paper concludes with strategic recommendations for national legislations to harmonize with international standards while fostering innovation.

PDF

References

Ashley, K. D. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press.

2.Balkin, J. M. (2021). The Path of Robotics Law. Yale Law Journal.

3.European Parliament (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council (The AI Act).

4.Floridi, L. (2021). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. Oxford University Press.

5.Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Law for Computer Scientists and Other Folk. Oxford University Press.

6.Kurzweil, R. (2022). The Singularity Is Nearer: When We Merge with AI. Viking.

7.OECD (2023). The OECD AI Principles. OECD Publishing, Paris.

8.Pasquale, F. (2020). New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI. Belknap Press.

9. Рахимова Н. Х. ВЛИЯНИЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИЙ НА УСТОЙЧИВОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ В УЗБЕКИСТАНЕ: ВЫЗОВЫ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ. XXI-ASR PEDAGOGI IMIJI: TARIXIY MEROS, XALQARO TAJRIBA, MUAMMOLAR VA YECHIMLAR mavzusidagi xalqaro ilmiy-amaliy konferensiya 2025-yil 30-may. https://universaljurnal.uz/index.php/jurnal/index

10.Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking.

11.UNESCO (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.

12.Vladeck, D. C. (2014). Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence. Washington Law Review.

13.Zittrain, J. (2023). The Future of the Internet—And How to Stop It (Revised AI Edition). Yale University Press.

14.Susskind, R. (2019). Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford University Press.

15.Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Version 2.0. Basic Books.